Dubai did its best to drop the bad news into the Bermuda Triangle of reporting – just hours before markets closed for Thanksgiving and the day before the beginning of the Islamic holiday Eid al-Adha. Dubai World, the investment vehicle and holding company owned by the government of Dubai, asked all of its creditors for an extension on debt issued by Dubai World and Nakheel, its real estate subsidiary.
Dubai World is inextricably tied to the government of Dubai; everything from ports to investment to real estate in Dubai falls under the umbrella of DW and its 90 subsidiaries. Sheikh Mohammed al-Maktoum established the company by decree in 2006 and remains the majority stakeholder in the privately-owned company. Obviously, the corporation falls under the category of “too big to fail,” notwithstanding bureaucratic protestations of the company’s independence from the government.
I’ve seen too big to fail before – I thought the same of Russia in 1998, and I paid the price accordingly. More recently, the United States government declared everything from AIG to General Motors too big to fail. If the US can’t let an ailing automaker sink in a recession, it’s difficult to believe that Dubai would let its flagship enterprise implode. Almost exactly a month ago, I wrote about Dubai’s excessive leverage and the foundation of debt on which it was built. Once again, secrecy is a major problem here. The government sends mixed signals on the degree of backing it will provide for DW – one day lending the Dubai banking system money, the next eschewing responsibility. There are many in Abu Dhabi, whose money comes mostly from petroleum and its derivatives, who would not mind seeing Dubai’s speculative excesses humbled. But the prosperity and reputation of the Emirates is inextricable from that of its most famous member.
Dubai’s biggest problem is simple – it is standing at the edge of a long, unsteady beam overlooking a precipice, and there is an increasingly small amount of real money at the other end holding it steady. There is nothing in Dubai that does not require a constant inflow of liquidity to maintain it; the ventilation systems of its high-rises regularly clog with sand, the city needs armies of underpaid laborers to keep it running, and many of the most ambitious developments, like “The World” and the Palm Jumeirah, are finding that building on artificial islands of sand was perhaps less secure than they had imagined. In many ways, Dubai’s physical reality reflects its fiscal condition – supported with more ambition than common sense.
The consequences of DW’s financial woes will echo into many corners of the world, from subcontinental slums to the marbled halls of European and British banks. India alone estimates that almost 340,000 migrant workers received employment in Dubai and all Indian workers in the city-state sent back $43.5 billion in remittances last year. Conditions are infamously atrocious in Emirate construction companies; many workers have had their passports confiscated, been forced to live in squalid compounds and received far less pay than promised. The article above details how one crew was fired by text message while travelling home for the Eid al-Adha holiday.
On the other side of the scale, Credit Suisse estimates that perhaps half of Dubai’s $80 billion in debt is held by European banks, with Standard Chartered and HSBC the most exposed. These holdings probably won’t be wiped out – Abu Dhabi may let its neighbor take a few hits around the face, but they won’t tolerate a knockout blow. Witness the government’s statement that it would bail out Dubai’s commitments ”on a case-by-case basis.”
Dubai World’s website still sports the fate-tempting slogan “The Sun Never Sets on Dubai World.” Unfortunately, as history teaches, the sun did set on the British Empire.